Cancer Remedies - Cut Cancer Deaths by 75% in the US and Canada

In 2009 a group of well respected medical researchers published a paper and an open letter. They brought together research that showed that breast and colon cancer deaths (two of the four cancers that cause the most deaths in the western world) could be reduced by three quarters if people increased the vitamin D levels in their blood. This can be done by spending time in the sun along with supplementation that is both a cheap and effective cancer preventive and cancer remedy.

Think of this: three out of four deaths of colon and breast cancer can be prevented or treated by increasing vitamin D to healthier levels. From a public health perspective these are huge figures.

The authors of the paper state that around 3000 research studies have been published in medical journals which show that increased vitamin D decreases cancer deaths. The case has been made.

So why are we not hearing about this in the media, from the public health promotion people, or from our doctors? Whenever a potential anti-cancer drug is found the Australian media make a big hoo-haa over it as if the holy grail had been finally located. But the case of vitamin D is slightly different.

For a start people will get a confused message. Vitamin D is metabolized by the body from the sun and for a generation now people have been marketed the fact that the sun causes cancer, not prevents it.

When I looked at the figures some 1800 people die a year in Australia from skin cancer while some 1800 people die a year in Australia from colon cancer as a result of low vitamin D levels.

Public health promotion marketers like simple messages. Either the sun is good or it is bad and the anti-skin cancer marketers got their message out first that the rays of the sun were bad and caused cancer. This really confuses the whole issue. The skin-cancer fraternity is very worried that if the message is changed to "the sun is good and reduces more cancers and other conditions than it causes" that people will again be silly and go sunbathing and getting burned. Multi-million dollars have been spent getting the negative message about the sun accepted by the general population.

However the thinking person doesn't have to be constrained by the problems of the health marketer. Instead, it is possible to take on the message that some sun is necessary, but don't get burned.

There is one more complication, however. There are some people who spend a lot of time in the sun but whose blood vitamin D levels are still very low. It is not known why this might be. For these people and for those who live in places where there is very low levels of sunlight supplements are needed to raise the vitamin D levels. A conservative supplementation level is set at 2000 IU per day while some doctors suggest that much higher levels are needed to boost the quantity in the blood to more therapeutic levels.

If you don't like taking supplements you can get your doctor to do a blood test to check your levels and monitor them over time. If time in the sun doesn't raise your vitamin D, then you will need supplements. It is both a cancer preventive and a cancer remedy. More than that, it is both a preventive and a remedy for your general health including other conditions such as heart disease, multiple sclerosis and diabetes. Vitamin D is a multipurpose cell enhancing product and you need it - one way or another.

Reference: Garland, CF, et al. Vitamin D for cancer prevention: global perspective. Ann Epidemiol 2009;19:468-483

Dr Harriet Denz-Penhey is an internationally recognized health researcher who has done groundbreaking research into patient self care in serious illness. The web site http://www.cancerremedies.org discusses aspects of natural cancer treatment and remedies for good general health.

This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Cancer Remedies - If Medicine Can't Help Are There Any Natural Cancer Treatments?

It is devastating for someone to be told that medicine has run out of options and there is no more treatment that can be offered. Some patients adapt to what they consider the inevitable. However some people fight tooth and nail to have a longer period of time before they die. They want to explore every option. Is this realistic? Are there any cancer remedies or natural cancer treatments that have been shown to work?

The official medical answer to that is, no, or medicine would be using them. However it has to be acknowledged that there are some people who, despite their medical prognosis, do much better than expected, and most medical people have no idea why that is. Much research has been done but few doctors know of it and even fewer believe that it is their role to tell patients about it.

I was talking to a medical professor about the research which showed that cancer patients who exercised did much better, on average than those who didn't exercise and about other research which showed that psychological stresses lead to reduced immune function. He knew the research existed, but did not believe it was his role to tell people how to live their lives and so was very vague about the results.

When asked whether a woman with breast cancer would want to know that if she undertook three hours of moderate exercise a week she might cut the chance of future cancer problems in half, he just shrugged his shoulders. It was the same when asked if someone with high blood pressure might like to know that good social support helps regulate their cardiovascular system. He made some comment about such research coming up in the year 3 medical curriculum but there was no emphasis on it thereafter. It wasn't his role to go into the psychosocial mire of people's lives.

It was similar when we talked about diet. When presented with evidence that some foods can reduce the damage done by sunlight (hence a skin cancer preventive), other foods which reduced the chance of mutation damage, nutrients which helped the body attack the cancer cells, he drew himself up to his full height and said, "I very much doubt it." He turned away.

What is really sad is that this doctor is one who believes he is open to research, open to alternatives and there to meet the needs of his patients.

To be fair, there is a huge amount of research out there. It is impossible for one person to stay up to date in regards to every aspect of medicine. This is even more difficult for the family physician or general practitioner who must cover all disciplines. Most of them make do with the guidelines given to them by governments and drug companies.

There is also the huge impact of the pharmaceutical companies who provide instant answers to dealing with the patient in the consultation. If the patient can leave the surgery with a prescription, in very many cases, both practitioner and patient are happy.

A great many when faced with matters of severe illness need to trust their doctor and just accept what they are told.

However there are a group who remember the few that do much better than expected and the cases of miracles they hear about in their religious tradition and on the TV. Many of these want to know, in detail, everything possible which might improve their outcomes. Sadly few medical professionals can tell them.

But now with the internet and the huge amount of information online it is possible for people who need to know to find out what they can do to improve their chances of recovery. I do offer a word of warning. It is not likely that there is just one herb, or highland berry, or magical elixir which will make the difference in terminal disease. It is much more likely that your cancer remedy will be a mixture of a healing diet, exercise, good self care, a useful psychology, social support and a connection to nature and place.

The fact that some people do much better than expected indicates that there is a physiological process by which cancers can regress and sometimes disappear altogether. So do keep hope alive and in the meantime explore what improves your quality of life. As one of the survivors in my research said, "Quality, quality, make every second count."

Dr Harriet Denz-Penhey is an internationally recognized health researcher who has done groundbreaking research into patient self care in serious illness. The web site http://www.cancerremedies.org discusses aspects of natural cancer treatment and remedies for good general health.

This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Natural Remedy Homeopathic Cancer Remedies - What Doctors Don't Tell You

There are hundreds of natural remedy homeopathic, herbal and alternative cancer treatments that your doctor won't tell you about...

Either because they are afraid to tell us or they simply won't, whatever the reason, it is up to US as victims or families of cancer victims to find the answers to the disease that can wreck our lives.

There are nutrition supplements that are actually causing complete remission of metastasized , aggressive stage IV cancers.

There was actually a stage IV cancer patient that refused treatment with both chemo and radiation and was given several weeks to live that got better using nutritional supplements!

The doctors can't tell you what they don't know and it is a known fact that they don't get taught about alternative remedy homeopathic type cancer treatments in medical school!

In fact, if they WOULD prescribe a natural cancer treatment that is not FDA approved, they could lose their license...the state can fine them and revoke or suspend their license.

They can even lose their rights to see patients in the hospital.

So it is clearly obvious that what doctors won't tell you is often because they CAN'T tell you...

But even so, many in the medical will also tell you that the alternative remedies for cancer are slowly seeping into the fringes of medical practices, giving them more options to offer their patients.

Without a shadow of a doubt we need to keep an open mind in all areas of alternative medicine and doctors as they both have their place in the medical field.

Just don't let anyone tell you that you can not get help with some alternative remedy homeopathic type of treatment!

Visit our Alternative Remedy Homeopathic blog for more cancer stories and articles...and also visit Natural-Cures-For-Cancer.Info [http://natural-cures-for-cancer.info/] where you can watch free videos on how to deal with cancer and overcome it.

This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Can Natural Cancer Remedies and Self Care Help Survival in Cancer?

I have just read another of those articles in a medical journal that stated that psychological interventions do not affect survival in cancer patients. However what the article was really saying that on the existing evidence the studies they reviewed have not shown, to the satisfaction of the statisticians that there was enough evidence that psychological interventions affect survival.

To be strictly accurate the authors should have acknowledged a lack of evidence and not said that psychological interventions did not affect survival. Despite their good intentions the authors fell into the well known scientific mistake of stating that absence of evidence is the same as evidence of absence. Just because they do not have the evidence from randomized controlled trials does not mean that psychological interventions cannot affect longevity.

And just because some interventions did not work does not preclude the possibility that others might do so. Whether an intervention works depends very much on whether that particular intervention is any good and whether the measurement scales actually pick up useful changes. There is now considerable evidence that despite claims such as in that article that psycho-social aspects of a person's makeup can and do affect their survival.

This paper reminded once again of another article written by a high profile oncologist who seemed to have a hobby of debunking the idea that the patient could do anything to improve their disease outcomes.

One of his articles attempted to "prove" that psycho-social issues (that is psychological and social aspects of the patient) had no impact on outcomes. I was appalled that he seemed to expect that four simplistic, once administered questionnaires could tell him anything useful that could be generalized to the world population. The particular questionnaires he selected to use were a very poor choice and showed he really had no idea of the literature surrounding good outcomes. Having shown that these questionnaires gave no useful results he then made the huge claim that differences in people, how they felt and what they did, had no impact on how long they lived.

This oncologist was one of the key influencers of colleagues and I frequently saw his paper being quoted by those who wanted to deny that there was any interaction between mind and body in physical disease.

Despite a huge increase in medical research papers published over the last couple of decades there are still too many medical practitioners who would want to deny that a person with cancer can make any difference to their outcomes. Many doctors just do not stay up to date with current research.

Strong positive emotions might not have been proven to the medical profession as being important to recovery, but then such positive emotions are impossible to explore scientifically in randomized controlled trials. Therefore their possible contribution is ignored. However you do not need permission or approval from your doctor to undertake good self care. So set out to explore all of those personal, psychological and social activities that you really enjoy.

Dr Harriet Denz-Penhey is an internationally recognized health researcher who has done groundbreaking research into patient self care in serious illness. The web site http://www.cancerremedies.org discusses aspects of natural cancer treatment and remedies for good general health.

This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Cancer Remedies - Is Hope Real or False?

When a person has cancer that has a very poor prognosis doctors are very wary about the patient having what they call "false hope." They get very angry with individuals and information websites who suggest that the fatal consequence might not have to happen. From their perspective it is cruel to suggest that someone has the power to heal when it is, in the doctor's opinion, patently not true. But is that stance justifiable?

I would have to answer both yes and no. It is justifiable as most people just want to do as they are told and for those who believe in medical cancer remedies it is probably accurate. However it is not justifiable in the sense that even if only one person has beaten the medical odds and recovered when it wasn't expected then there is a physiological pathway for healing to occur.

If there is a biological mechanism for a cancer tumor to regress, to get smaller in size, then there is a mechanism for it to continue to regress, perhaps to extinction. I was reading a medical journal article that discussed how the extended hours of summer sun, and the body's conversion of it to vitamin D could encourage a regression of the size of metastases. And if there are pathways such as this then hope is reasonable.

One of the interesting pieces of research in people with HIV has shown that those who have positive illusions about how long they personally will live and about how much they can control the illness, actually do better than those who do not. This bothers some doctors and researchers as living an illusory life is not generally considered to be indicative of good mental health or good health generally.

Additionally people do not do worse if or when they find their illusions shattered by progressing illness. This also bothers the same doctors and researchers. These behavioral aspects are likely to be very similar to people with cancer.

As a result of these two findings doctors and researchers have to rethink how to manage patients who appear to be quite unrealistic and irrational in their beliefs about their potential longevity and quality of life. Instead of trying to disillusion them and bringing them back to reality, they should encourage their patients' autonomy and positive attitudes, praising them for their work at improving their quality of life and for their survival to this point. They should recognize that positive attitudes are just one aspect of cancer remedy self care.

My own research has found that long term survivors interpreted every symptom as an indicator of improving health, not progressing disease. They preferred not to have the evidence of progression pointed out to them, but instead to focus on those little aspects over which they could control.

This control could be physical, as in taking some exercise to assist lymphatic drainage, or it could be imaginary, as in creatively visualizing the lymph finding a new way to drain after surgery had removed some of the glands. In one case the patient interpreted her badly swollen leg as an indicator, not of metastasized melanoma needing lymph glands removed, but of the cancer being removed and her body now clear of the cancer. She was now visualizing her leg as normal. The leg did return to normal from being over twice the normal size, and her multiple chest metastases regressed fully so that she became clear of cancer for years. Sadly I lost contact with her.

This patient had refused to attend the oncology clinic because the doctor was too negative. The patient's oncologist would sometimes meet up with her husband at his work, ask after her health, and go on his way shaking his head saying, "Impossible, it just doesn't happen."

But it does happen. There are many natural cancer remedies that can be undertaken but I would urge any person who is ill not to put faith in just one herb, pill or potion. Natural healing is much more complicated than that. It is a holistic treatment requiring not just one aspect to be addressed, but the body, mind, social relationships and more. Seek and you shall find.

Dr Harriet Denz-Penhey is an internationally recognized health researcher who has done groundbreaking research into patient self care in serious illness. The web site http://www.cancerremedies.org discusses aspects of natural cancer treatment and remedies for good general health.

This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Cancer Remedies - Do I Have To?

It is usual when someone has cancer for the individual and society to think in terms of using every possible drug in the medical arsenal to attack the cancer in an attempt to subdue and kill it. Many a patient has been told that they have to "Fight the cancer." This is the case whether the cancer remedies being sought are conventional medical approaches or one of the natural cancer treatments. But do we really have to "Fight" cancer?

Some months ago I was discussing this with a nurse who used massage, aromatherapy and other alternative treatments alongside the conventional medical care prescribed by the patients' doctors. I mentioned that it might not be necessary for patients to "fight" and that what we are talking about are metaphors, not the reality itself.

It was as though I had opened Pandora's Box. She very quickly moved from being anxious to angry to a sort of fury. How dare I try to kill her patients by taking away the last weapon they had: their own will to fight the dread disease. I decided to beat a retreat but thought quite a lot about her response. I realized that the concept of "fighting cancer" had become a belief as strong as many religious beliefs and for some the thought of not fighting was very disempowering.

As a researcher I have undertaken much research with people who doctors thought could not survive their terminal conditions, and who not only survived but thrived. What I discovered in this research was that although a number of the survivors talked about "fighting" their disease, their lives illustrated a different story.

What the survivors actually did was to accept the illness, not fight it. While they accepted they were ill, that the doctors had given them a terminal diagnosis they did not necessarily accept that the illness was terminal. Those that did accept the diagnosis was terminal later changed their minds, and they decided the illness was either chronic or in remission, or going into remission.

Their focus was not on fighting their cancer, but on what they could do on that day to improve their quality of life for that day, and for the future. Very early on in the illness process much of their day to day focus was on undertaking the conventional radiotherapy and chemotherapy. But within that they also kept their family and personal values intact.

The survivors recognized that although they couldn't control their cancer they could take charge of much of their lives. They would focus on what was important to them and became a very strong personality. How this actually worked out in practice was very different for each of them.

The cancer became just another part of their very complex lives. Yes, it got in the way of other parts of their life, but instead of becoming very irritated and angry they moved quite quickly to accepting its presence and then working out how to get around the inconveniences of the symptoms and treatment. Yes, they acknowledged, the treatment was horrendous, but... and then they would go on to express some aspect of something important to them.

Life, and the cancer which was part of their life, was not something to be fought, but to be accepted. I won't go as far as saying that they embraced their cancer and the other negativity of life, but they embraced the rest of their lives and accepted the less than desirable aspects.

Fighting is a highly stressful activity and high negative stress further compromises an immune system that is attempting to deal with the disease. Acceptance and focusing on the positive aspects that they could control are much more likely to have a positive impact on the immune system and contribute to healing.

We don't usually think of positive psychological attributes as being a cancer remedy or a natural cancer treatment. However, perhaps we should.

Dr Harriet Denz-Penhey is an internationally recognized health researcher who has done groundbreaking research into patient self care in serious illness. The web site http://www.cancerremedies.org discusses aspects of natural cancer treatment and remedies for good general health.

This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Relief Remedies - Drugs and Their Efficacy

When we are looking for relief remedies for a medical condition many in the community turn to their medical practitioner to help them find a remedy for their problem. In this they make the assumption that their doctor is the best person to advise them as to what can make them better. As a result of this belief most expect that any drug prescribed by their doctor will be effective, but is this the case?

That very much depends on what you mean by effective. As a health researcher I have been looking at this question for more than a year. Most people I ask expect a prescribed drug to be 90-100% effective, otherwise why would the doctor prescribe it? Doctors become very uncomfortable when I give these figures as they know that few drugs are that effective. They do understand that a high belief is likely to improve the outcome for the patient, but they also recognize that that is not what it necessarily all about. I have often heard them say, "Patients have unrealistic expectations of what drugs can do."

There are a number of issues here. The first is the matter of evidence. The second is the matter of who is allowed to say what the evidence is and how this impacts on what can be offered to people who want to improve their health.

While this is obviously a very large topic I would like to draw out just a couple of points.

I accept that most medical practitioners mean well and care for their patients. However most medical practitioners, their employers and the pharmaceutical companies make enormous profits out of people who are ill. Whenever billions of dollars are at stake then we have to recognize the moral hazard that exists. It is just too easy to turn a blind eye to the lack of good outcomes and worse, the level and severity of side effects to say nothing of the effect of the cost on the patient's wallet.

For example chemotherapy only adds just over 2% to the average 5-year survival rate of people with cancer with horrendous side effects for the vast majority of patients. Breast cancer patients have an average life span of 20 years and a 78-85% 5-year survival rate in Australia but chemotherapy only contributes 1.5% to that survival rate. A range of cancers for which chemo is prescribed add NO additional survivors. It is time that these figures became well known. Chemotherapy drugs are not the cancer remedies most of us have come to believe.

Statins, a drug prescribed to lower cholesterol levels also has very low rates of effectiveness. When I searched dozens of the top medical journal papers looking at the cholesterol issues, and buried right down into the data (ignoring the positive titles, introductions and discussions), I was gobsmacked. Firstly, the drugs had no improvement in death rates for women or the elderly. And secondly for men the number needed to treat to save one life was 250 for five years on the drugs. 1250 years of drug taking with many suffering side effects to save one life?

As a third example, the package insert of the H1N1 monovalent vaccine says [Section 12.1 Mechanism of Action] "the administration of the flu vaccine has not been correlated with protection from influenza illness". This is amazing in its audacity. Here we have the government promoted drive for mass vaccination and its own covering paperwork says that there is no evidence that it offers protection.

These examples are just a few showing the moral hazard from profit making - pharmaceutical companies, hospitals, doctors and government are all involved.

So what does this mean to us as individuals? If you have an expectation of 90-100% efficacy for a drug prescribed then you need to tell the doctor - you are paying for their time and the drugs, after all. If you are asked to go on long term medication then you might like to ask for evidence in writing that the drug does come up to standard. When my own doctor tried to scare me into taking a particular medication and provided me with the scientific papers I discovered they didn't say what the drug companies and doctor said they did. When I discussed the results with her she was quite perplexed.

Perhaps one way to think of it is that if the relief remedies being offered are bio-identical to what the body produces or is a nutrient normally found in foods known to be good for you then you can be reasonably comfortable in taking it. However if it is a pharmaceutical drug, then exercise caution and demand to see the "rigorous scientific evidence sufficient to substantiate the claims." You want the actual medical journal papers, not the government guidelines. Even if you can't make much sense out of the paper, it makes your doctor think several times before making unrealistic claims.

Dr Harriet Denz-Penhey is an internationally recognized health researcher who has done groundbreaking research into patient self care in serious illness. The web site http://www.cancerremedies.org discusses aspects of natural cancer treatment and remedies for good general health.

This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Can Natural Herbal Remedies Help Cancer Victims?

It is always difficult to promote the use of natural methods to treat this disease. Cancer is a very serious disease, which kills millions of people throughout the world and particularly in the West. Traditional medicine wants to arrogate to itself the exclusive right of scrutiny and treatment in this area. Yet the results are far from satisfying.

The cancer continues to defy the technology of modern medicine and remains, after decades of intensive research, an enigmatic disease, responsible each year of millions of death. While a few types of cancer are now successfully treated, several others remain extremely difficult to fight and are a major cause of mortality. More than ever, finding new ways in which we can improve the effectiveness of current anti-cancer therapies is of paramount importance. The naturotherapy is one of those means.

Many oncologists recognize naturaltherapy as a preventive mode in order to avoid the development of cancer. They also recommend regular consumption of certain foods as a method to support conventional treatments for those who are undergoing cancer treatment, radiation and chemotherapy. However, for some, herbal remedies or natural cancer treatments have no positive effects on cancers, either preventive or curative.

A global study on a large scale has shown that if each person consumed at least 150g of a variety of fresh fruits and vegetables per day, the risk of cancer would be decreased by 30%. If there were a pill that would fall by 30% the risk of cancer, it is likely that everyone would consume it. Why not try natural remedies? In fact, most plants used in natural remedies can grow in your own backyard (Astragalus, Burdock root, Green tea, for example). Along with natural cancer alternative and/or conventional cancer treatment, alimentation plays an important role in your recovery from cancer.

A good alimentation has not only a significant role in cancer prevention, but can also provide the cancer patient who must undergo chemotherapy or radiotherapy, the means to fight against the aggressor. No treatment can work properly without a healthy diet, either conventional or natural cancer treatment.

The remedies exist in the form of dried or fresh plants for preparation and capsules or liquid ready to use. Of course, it is illegal in the USA to claim that a natural remedy can treat cancer, but we believe it is unfair not to mention these methods, which are supported by some doctors and testimonials patients, have no anticancer properties.

Many supplements and natural remedies can be used to fight against cancer, either alone or in supplement to conventional therapies. Our Cancer herbal remedies may reduce hair loss, improve appetite, reduce nausea (for those undergoing chemotherapy), and amplify the positive tumor shrinking effects of radiation therapy. To learn more, visit our cancer herbal remedies website and save 5%.

Raphaelo is a nutritionist who strongly believes in natural healing and disease prevention. He loves to share his own personal beneficial experience with natural remedies to others. To learn more about natural cancer remedies, nails vitamins, etc. Visit his cancer herbal remedies website.

This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Cancer Remedies - Medical Vs Natural Cancer Treatments

There is a strong move within the medical communities and government bodies such as the US FDA to make sure that people who are ill are not subject to scam claims about alternative cancer remedies and natural cancer treatments.

This would be fair enough if the medical community was actually offering treatments that worked. Unfortunately some of them have been shown to be medically ineffective. An important medical paper in 2004 showed that chemotherapy only increased the average 5 year survival rates by just over 2% (reference below).

Chemotherapy for breast cancer, for example, has an average increased 5-year survival rate of only 1.5%. A number of cancers (soft tissue sarcoma, melanoma of skin, uterus, prostate, bladder, kidney and multiple myeloma) were shown to have no increase in survival due to chemotherapy at all.

Doctors often talk about patients having unrealistic expectations about the efficacy of drugs, but to my way of thinking they only have themselves to blame. None of the doctors I work closely with in our medical school had ever spoken to patients about the low effectiveness of chemotherapy. In fact only one of them knew exactly how ineffective the drugs actually were.

If we take the breast cancer example again - women with breast cancer have a 78-85% 5-year survival rate in Australia, of which only 1.5% was due to chemotherapy. None of my friends who have had breast cancer were told that the average length of survival for breast cancer is 20 years nor about the high survival rate, nor about the low impact of chemotherapy. All believed that they needed chemotherapy to have any hope of survival.

The flip side of this terrible situation is that if only 1.5% of survivors are due to chemotherapy, then 76.5-83.5% is due to other things. Surgery and radiotherapy will play some part. But so too, does the body's natural ability to heal. If you really want to keep on living it makes sense to spend a little time exploring those aspects of healing, known to science and to our cultural traditions which will improve our quality of life, and hopefully, our longevity.

There is much known to science but a lot of this is tucked away in health psychology text books and journals. Some of this is known through pop psychology but may not be accurate. For example, it is often believed that to survive you have to be positive all the time. My own research has shown that this is not the case, however being positive most of the time is one of the characteristics of survivors.

Governmental bodies and anti-scam scientists are particularly hard on those who promote supplements suggesting that all people are after is making money out of the sick. No doubt this is sometimes the case. But what excuse is there for promoting chemotherapy as THE answer to cancer when it only increases survival by an average of just over 2% and in some cases, is not of benefit at all. Who benefits from this? Who is paid the big money?

As a researcher I have to say that it is highly unlikely that just one supplement, herb, fancy berry from the highlands of somewhere will be sufficient to make the difference of life or death. However there are some good scientific pointers to suggest that avoiding sugar and flour which feed cancers, adding anti cancer foods of brightly colored vegetables and fruit, adding some supplements proven to be advantageous, taking regular exercise, and undertaking certain self care activities would definitely be positive to health. And many regions around the world have their traditional cancer remedies, their natural cancer treatments which might be good to add to your overall regimen. Check out all of your options and don't let yourself be bullied by anyone.

Reference: Morgan G, Ward R, Barton M. The contribution of cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adult malignancies. Clinical Oncology 2004;16:549-560. This is reasonably readable and anyone with cancer should get a copy (try your university medical library - they can download it for you). It isn't very chatty, mostly just how they came to the figures for each of the main cancers.

Dr Harriet Denz-Penhey is an internationally recognized health researcher who has done groundbreaking research into patient self care in serious illness. The web site http://www.cancerremedies.org discusses aspects of natural cancer treatment and remedies for good general health.

This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Brain Cancer Remedies - Secure, Successful and Non-Invasive

The mind is comprised of thousands and thousands of cells and these cells begin building correct soon after the 3rd month of conceiving, till age of 7 years. Following mental performance cells quit splitting, they're not meant to divide once more, and their unit is below rigid control. Even so, once the management goes astray even inside of a particular cell, the cell may perhaps commence dividing uncontrollably and also the researches on cancer demonstrate a quickly separating cell that doesn't have regulators to cease it commence generating far more and extra clones major to formation of the tumor (this malignant tissue has cells that are cancerous), and that is referred to as cancer. A tumor could be malignant if it includes cancer cells or simply because of the location. A malignant tumor comprising of cancerous cells can spread to other components within the brain or spinal-cord, therefore destroying the wholesome tissue. Brain cancer remedies consist of many mixtures of therapies to efficiently battle the condition. A few of choices listed here?-

Surgical treatment: Brain tumors consist of all these tumors that are existing inside the cranium or even the central nervous system. The tumors that are not situated close to the important elements of brain that entail vision or breathing regulation are referred to as very low grade tumors and could be eliminated surgically. Surgical procedure is performed on main brain tumors, and is also generally adopted by radiation therapy. Radiation remedy is completed to get rid of perhaps the tiniest traces of tumor. In certain cases chemotherapy can also be for successful brain cancer treatments.

Radiation Treatment: If an individual has numerous tumors, then entire brain radiation remedy is recognized as. This sort of remedy calls for 20-40 periods more than an interval of 4-6 weeks. Also mid- and high-grade tumors (which develop much more quickly than low-grade ones), need to be surgically eliminated adopted by radiotherapy. These tumors tend to spread in to the encircling tissues generating it hard for medical doctors to get rid of them throughout surgical treatment. In the event the tumor is inoperable, it really is handled entirely by radiotherapy.

Chemotherapy: Brain cancer therapies relating to chemotherapy are performed orally or through IV. The threat elements associated with this sort of therapy are that the regular tissues are destroyed together with the cells of cancer. Therefore an individual could endure from unwanted side effects like significant nausea, vomiting, tiredness and excess weight loss. Chemotherapy is generally provided right after medical procedures or following radiation therapy. It's most successful for mid-grade tumors. Sufferers who're categorized as "high threat patients" are offered chemotherapy as being a component of the preliminary treatment. Even sufferers whose analysis says "recurrent malignancy" call fora second medical procedures that's once more adopted by chemotherapy.

Radio Medical procedures: This therapy has emerged being an choice to surgery. By way of this the tumor might be handled inside 1-5 periods only by delivering significant doses of radiation accurately. For this, it's significant to understand the precise place in the brain tumor, but sufferers discover it unpleasant or painful.

The rate of incidence of brain tumors is quite lower, becoming 8.2 per 100,000 for main ones, whilst it's 8.3 per 100,000 for metastatic ones. Typically it's tough in order to identify brain tumors because of any distinct symptom. This is certainly mainly because signs and symptoms related with brain tumor typically mimic the signs and symptoms of other diseases. On the other hand, you can find brain cancer treatment options for each main and metastatic brain tumors. The crucial to treating them lies in early detection.

My name is Charles Forsey and i am expert in brain cancer treatment. Please visit my site at http://www.pancreaticcancersymptomssite.info to learn how to get more health knowledge.

This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.